Rebutted False Arguments About the Common Law, Form #08.025

This book is a gauntlet thrown at the feet of modern government—an unflinching exposé arguing that America’s legal system has quietly replaced the people’s ancient birthright with a maze of statutory franchises, compelled obligations, and manufactured “persons.” Drawing from Scripture, the Founders, and more than a century of case law, it insists that the true common law—“the body of law derived from judicial decisions, rather than from statutes or constitutions”—still exists, still protects private humans, and still stands as a barrier against state overreach. The text opens with a blistering critique of civil government as a “pagan civic temple” where judges act as priests and statutory codes function as idols, warning that when public servants abandon “humble obedience to the Constitution,” they convert free people into subjects.

What follows is a systematic demolition of the most widespread misconceptions about the common law—claims that it no longer exists, that it is merely current case law, that it cannot be invoked, or that it is subordinate to statutory civil codes. Through historical analysis, Supreme Court precedent, and theological argument, the book contends that private rights are self‑executing, beyond the reach of legislatures, and enforceable without statutory permission. It argues that statutory “benefits,” civil “personhood,” and compelled domicile are tools of modern servitude, while the common law remains the last refuge for those who refuse to be absorbed into what it calls the government’s “franchise system.” In its most striking passages, it warns that any judge who refuses to protect constitutional rights commits “a selective repeal of the Constitution itself”—a betrayal of the very purpose for which government was created.

110 pages